The construction industry has often been perceived as a litigious minefield where contractors fall into two categories: those who have weathered lawsuits and those awaiting their turn. It’s a comical yet grim reality brought to light recently by the latest Credit Risk report, placing the construction sector third in the number and cost of legal filings across all U.S. business sectors.
–
An impressive total of 212,582 legal cases emerged against construction businesses in the past year alone. The consequent financial toll eclipsed a staggering $3.36 billion. This unfortunate scenario mainly springs from the convoluted character of the industry. A single project could comprise dozens of parties, leading to inevitable disputes and numerous claims.
–
This multi-layered setup is not typically seen in other industries, where transactions usually involve fewer parties. A construction project doesn’t involve a simple two-party transaction, rather it encompasses a web of relationships with varying interests & trades, creating an environment rife for conflict.
–
The precarious economic climate has magnified these opportunities for discord, as tightened access to capital and increased scrutiny from lenders has complicated transactions even further. Disagreements may arise when approvals for things like change orders need to go through the lender.
–
Embedded provisions in contracts—rules that must be applied consistently across the project hierarchy—can lead to a cascade of disputes when a party fails to meet its obligations. This domino effect of litigation has been prominently demonstrated in large-scale projects such as the recent New York City’s condominium tower disputes.
–
So, what factors contribute to the heavy monetary losses seen in construction lawsuits? The growing complexity and size of projects, in addition to rising costs of materials, labor, and land, mean that higher amounts are now at stake. The growing reliance on digital platforms has further inflated costs, leading to extensive electronic discovery processes that require significant resources to manage.
–
So, how can we navigate this litigious labyrinth?
A proactive approach is crucial. Avoiding claims in the first place and incorporating language in contracts that reduces costs when disputes do occur is the first step. This begins with meticulous attention to contract details. Standard form contracts may provide a foundation, but they need to be fine-tuned to reflect unique project specifications and emerging industry trends.
–
Constructive modifications to the contract could be a good insurance policy against future disputes. For instance, it’s essential to account for factors like fluctuating material costs, which may not be covered in basic contracts. Contractors can also limit the types of claims that can arise under certain scenarios, thus mitigating potential risk.
–
Even with the best precautions, however, claims can still arise. In such cases, certain contractual clauses can help keep the financial implications in check. Including provisions for mediation can help resolve issues informally, saving both time and money.
–
Liquidated damage clauses, which predetermine the compensation amount in case of breach of agreement, can also help expedite enforcement and put the contractor on notice of potential costs. While this may create initial discomfort during negotiations, it can facilitate smoother discussions down the line by clarifying risks from the outset.
–
Waiving damage rights may seem like a tempting shortcut, but this can potentially result in higher costs when disputes occur. It is therefore recommended not to hastily discard these rights, as they might hold the key to protecting one’s financial interests in the long run.
–
In conclusion, while the complex landscape of the construction industry is ripe for legal disputes, strategically crafted contracts and preemptive measures can serve as the blueprint for a successful, litigation-free project. After all, prevention is always better than cure.
–
